I love Americans! They’re so warm and cuddly.
Apart from the long slow public death of Britney Spears there’s no bigger story in the states at the moment than the presidential election primaries and particularly the race between Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton for the Democratic Party nomination.

Obama in the Sun (Time for a Change)
Before Iowa the common understanding both in the commercial media and on the internet was that Hillary Clinton would win the nomination because she is the preferred candidate with the Democratic Party establishment(the old boys). But then Obama blew Hillary away in Iowa, mostly because he was able to radically mobilize independent voters(who typically don’t vote in large numbers) behind his slogan of Change! – whoopdedoo.

The Hillary Show (More Change?)
All of a sudden Hillary was dead meat. The internet was abuzz with Obama-praise with some writers comparing him to JFK and even Martin Luther King Jr[1]. Within days the common understanding switched to one in which Obama would continue to produce record turnouts of independents who would board his all-singing-all-dancing change-train. Obama arrived in New Hampshire ready to drink champagne from Hillary’s cold skull. But then Hillary cried on TV, or at least almost cried. And before you could say Oprah a furious debate started up in the media over whether the tears were real or faked and whether voters would see it as a turn-on or proof that women aren’t strong enough to be president[2]. As it turns out On Monday Hillary Clinton teared up in despair. On Tuesday she had reason to cry with euphoria. The televised secretion may have changed the election.

Breakingdown News
As we all know by now she stormed back into the lead in New Hampshire by out-doing Obama in the mobilzing-of-a-record-number-of-voters stakes. So where does this leave the primaries? Well, it’s a sure bet that the democratic race will now settle into a standard drawn-out battle for Super Tuesday. Both candidates have shown their mettle and found their voices. Obama will continue pitching his promise of hope and change. Hillary will continue pitching her message of being up to the task and strong while not being afraid to show some emotion. And the Republican primaries will remain a very, very distant second as far as star power[3] is concerned.

Mike Huckabee tries to be as cool as Bill Clinton
But what I’m interested in is why Americans responded so strongly first to Obama and then to Hillary. What is it about that great(?) nation that makes them so absurd?
Through my visits to the US and my lifelong consumption of its media I’ve come to learn, among others, two things that seem to be ingrained deep in the psyche of the overwhelming majority of Americanos. And I believe that these two characteristics, bred and refined over generations, were demonstrated with unique power and in close succession in the Hillary v Obama drama.
But let me first say that while I consider these behaviours to be weaknesses in the US overmind/oversoul they are also two of the fundamentals that give the American nation is undeniable strength and part of the reason why they have come to dominate the planet. It’s swings and roundabouts, what the individual looses is gained by the group.
The two characteristics[4] that I believe drove the primary votes are, firstly, a very strong need to belong and, secondly, reverence for the act of ‘opening-up’.
Belonging
American kids are raised to(among other things) belong; belong to a family, belong to school, belong to a team. Nowhere in the world is the notion of supporting your school, your alma-mater as strong as in US college football. Men wear signet rings of the years that their schools won the State Championship with more pride than their wedding bands. When attending a conference they might remove their wedding band when screwing the PA, but no-sir that 1998 Mid-Western States Championship ring aint goin’ nowhere.
What makes this drive to belong even more amazing is that it isn’t seen as fear of isolation, people don’t join church groups and soccer lift pools and community watch teams and fucking veterans’ appreciation societies because they fear being isolated. Somehow they’ve developed an understanding that belonging is a positive thing, it’s warm and friendly and makes the world a better place. They really do believe in that shit. They really believe that there is no reason to not belong to every grouping imaginable because there’s nothing to loose. So what if we all wear identical uniforms when we go bowling or drive 9 hours in convoy supporting our school’s cheerleaders when they compete out of state, it makes us a community. It freaks me out that they don’t get the fact that while belonging to a group isn’t a bad thing it doesn’t come without a price, there always is a part of your individual identity that you have to give up.
And Barack Obama tapped into this glowing need to belong. He found his voice when he pitched himself as the man to change US politics once and for all – to deliver it from the evils of partisanship and self-serving infighting. But while his campaign advisors certainly did expect to get a big bite from disgruntled voters from this pitch I bet that never in their wildest dreams did they expect to pick up so many independent voters. In a veritable showering of love and belonging hundreds of thousands of independents have bought into Obama’s message and have joined him in his crusade. They’ve joined him and are ready to heal the world, because they know that Together We Can! Chant that until you puke.

I belong to Obama
Opening up
If there is one thing more bizarre about Americans than their overwhelming joy at belonging to something[5] it is their reverence for the act of opening up. There seems to be a subtle distrust of people who don’t share their feelings with the group. Reality TV is a prime carrier of this sentiment. In a previous season of The Bachelor one of contestants[6] was continually berated by the other chicks for ‘not sharing’. She was ostracized from the group and described as ‘not real’. Later during the season the chicks got together, after what seemed like several glasses of wine, and through a series of confrontations eventually this girl broke down and cried a little. She then sat down with the girls on the couch and explained how she was afraid of being hurt so didn’t want to show too much emotion but that she now realised that they would all support her blah blah blah blah. A later interview with the ringleader of the chicks was revealing; suddenly she ‘really appreciated’ how the first girl ‘opened up’ and ‘shared her feelings’. How fucked up is that?
And so, the voters responded when Hillary opened up, when she shared. And if there is one thing that is more powerful than simply sharing it is the redemption of a person who previously was cold and aloof who then opened up to the warm embrace of her loving community. Beautiful.
Obama got voters to join him in his quest, to be part of his mission. Hillary opened up and shared her hopes, dreams and fears with the nation. And for both of them the nation responded in a cascade of votes. An absurd and beautiful land.